Issue
Whether statements made during custodial interrogation are admissible unless procedural safeguards are used to protect the privilege against self-incrimination.
Holding
The Court held that suspects must be informed of key rights before custodial interrogation, including the right to remain silent and the right to counsel.
Facts
Miranda was questioned by police while in custody and signed a confession without first being advised of his right to remain silent or his right to counsel.
Rule
Before custodial interrogation, law enforcement must provide warnings designed to protect the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination.
Reasoning
The Court emphasized the inherently coercive nature of custodial interrogation. Warnings are required so suspects understand their rights and any waiver is made knowingly and voluntarily.